|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|
03-02-2008, 03:25 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Sovereign
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,078
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by metron9
“Care to try for 200 MPG? It has the size and comparable performance of a mid-sized SUV. It's not only possible; it's looking to be in production within the year.”
Well there you go, Private companies designing fuel efficient cars that are 5 times or more efficient than what some politician wants to mandate. Not subsidized by the government and just around the corner.
Problem solved.
However it doesn’t use gasoline at all it uses hydrogen fuel cells. My point is you can’t get 40mpg on Gasoline for a 4 passenger size car. We already have cars that get up to 60mpg that use hybrid-electric. My neighbor just bought a Toyota Prius. No government mandated 40mpg minimum standard law.
Here is a list of the top 10 cars now that you can buy. What I hear Obama saying is Americans won’t have the freedom to buy a big honking truck that gets 10mpg if he/she wants too.
From Transportation « Environment & the World
1 Toyota Prius (hybrid-electric) 60/51
2 Honda Civic Hybrid 49/51
3 Toyota Camry Hybrid 40/38
4 Ford Escape Hybrid FWD 36/31
5 Toyota Yaris (manual) 34/40
6 Toyota Yaris (automatic) 34/39
7 Honda Fit (manual) 33/38
8 Toyota Corolla (manual) 32/41
9 Hyundai Accent (manual) 32/35
Kia Rio (manual) 32/35
10 Ford Escape Hybrid 4WD 32/29
Mercury Mariner Hybrid 4WD 32/29
|
I may be off subject here, if I am I opologise.
However I was glancing at your list and remembering how some people warned the Auto Companies of Detroit to get with the program and start concentrating on mpg, back in the late 60's.
I worked as assembly worker for 30+yrs,so I heard this conversation,k and now I am hearing it again. I see GMC,CHRYSLER,CHEVYS are gone by the wayside according to your list.
America is supposed to compete with other countries not just buy from other countries. 
|
|
|
03-02-2008, 03:36 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Marquis
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,042
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by presluc
I may be off subject here, if I am I opologise.
However I was glancing at your list and remembering how some people warned the Auto Companies of Detroit to get with the program and start concentrating on mpg, back in the late 60's.
I worked as assembly worker for 30+yrs,so I heard this conversation,k and now I am hearing it again. I see GMC,CHRYSLER,CHEVYS are gone by the wayside according to your list.
America is supposed to compete with other countries not just buy from other countries. 
|
American car companies just don't build quality cars anymore. Toyota and Honda, which builds most of their U.S. cars in the U.S. are destroying the U.S. makers. They make a better product, for the same price, that lasts longer, needs less repairs, have better performance, and have all the same features.
I have an American car atm, and I can safely say it's the last American car I'll buy again, unless they get their acts together. It just needs to be repaired to often.
For example, the window motors have needed repair SIX times now since I got it four years ago. This is one among many issues. And I don't even drive often. Only on the weekends.
|
|
|
03-02-2008, 05:34 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Baron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,106
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caltex
If people want that kind of fuel efficiency they have to not only pay more for the car, but also give up performance.
|
From a gasoline engine, perhaps...
To the OP, almost 20 years ago, GM produced a working prototype of a 5-seat passenger vehicle (the Ultralite) that went from 0-60 in 7.3 seconds and got 84 mpg on a pure gasoline engine.
__________________
Tax & Spend > Borrow & Spend
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
Every feeling you've ever felt can be found in the works of Beethoven, Bruckner, Mahler, and Wagner.
|
|
|
03-02-2008, 05:44 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Sovereign
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,078
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caltex
American car companies just don't build quality cars anymore. Toyota and Honda, which builds most of their U.S. cars in the U.S. are destroying the U.S. makers. They make a better product, for the same price, that lasts longer, needs less repairs, have better performance, and have all the same features.
I have an American car atm, and I can safely say it's the last American car I'll buy again, unless they get their acts together. It just needs to be repaired to often.
For example, the window motors have needed repair SIX times now since I got it four years ago. This is one among many issues. And I don't even drive often. Only on the weekends.
|
If the factories were in America American auto workers would make good quality cars.
If you know anything about auto industry look to the designers and engeniers,and ceo's they make the decisions on what kind of car they want built, not the blue collar auto worker.
I suppose Americans don't make "quality "pet food anymore either compared to poisoned pet food.?
I suppose Americans don't make "quality safe" toys anymore compared to lead based toys? 
A majority of stuff that is recalled or pulled off the shelf check where it was made, check where the parts came from?. 
|
|
|
03-02-2008, 05:48 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Marquis
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,042
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by presluc
If the factories were in America American auto workers would make good quality cars.
If you know anything about auto industry look to the designers and engeniers,and ceo's they make the decisions on what kind of car they want built, not the blue collar auto worker.
I suppose Americans don't make "quality "pet food anymore either compared to poisoned pet food.?
I suppose Americans don't make "quality safe" toys anymore compared to lead based toys? 
A majority of stuff that is recalled or pulled off the shelf check where it was made, check where the parts came from?. 
|
I didn't say the problem isn't with the American workers. American workers are building the Toyota's and Honda's sold in America too.
The problem is with the American car companies, their management, and the unions. The unions over protect under performing employee's, and the management run poor business plans and design worse cars.
GM, Ford, Chevy, Auto unions, all need to get their acts together and start creating better products.
|
|
|
03-02-2008, 05:51 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Marquis
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,042
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by prrriiide
From a gasoline engine, perhaps...
To the OP, almost 20 years ago, GM produced a working prototype of a 5-seat passenger vehicle (the Ultralite) that went from 0-60 in 7.3 seconds and got 84 mpg on a pure gasoline engine.
|
General Motors Ultralite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You're using misleading information. That is no standard automobile. It has a carbon fiber shell, a two stroke engine (hello crazy amounts of pollution), and other very expensive parts.
That doesn't show that we can make cars with great performance and MPG, low pollution, and just chose not to. It shows that using crazy expensive technology we can make cool stuff, albeit impractical, unsafe, and just for fun. Of course you can get great 0-60's with two stroke engines. 
Last edited by Caltex; 03-02-2008 at 05:57 PM.
|
|
|
03-02-2008, 06:01 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,758
|
Well if we're going to pass transportation mandates for the sake of the environment then why stop there? Why not mandate public transportation?
|
|
|
03-02-2008, 06:07 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vedunia
Posts: 4,950
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caltex
General Motors Ultralite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You're using misleading information. That is no standard automobile. It has a carbon fiber shell, a two stroke engine (hello crazy amounts of pollution), and other very expensive parts.
That doesn't show that we can make cars with great performance and MPG, low pollution, and just chose not to. It shows that using crazy expensive technology we can make cool stuff, albeit impractical, unsafe, and just for fun. Of course you can get great 0-60's with two stroke engines. 
|
Does anyone read my posts?
Their are lots of Diesel cars out there that make 40 MTG... this discussion makes me want to look for an petrol powered car as well... even though I really don't care if a car is diesel or petrol powered as long as the (environmental) performance is right.
Last edited by Slartibartfas; 03-02-2008 at 06:26 PM.
|
|
|
03-02-2008, 06:12 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 206
Country:
Country:
|
How fast do we really need to go on the public roads... ? I mean the dam speed limit is 75 in most states... if you need to run like a bat out of hell and do 0 - 60 in 2 seconds - then people should try auto racing for a living/hobby or get a motorcycle. Lets get real.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|