|
Tad for Dems? Superdelegates
Hey, how likely do you think the following scenario is:
Obama, building on his momentum, has a slight lead in regular delegates going into the convention. But Clinton's political experience and connections net her more superdelegates, and she winds up with the nomination.
How this looks to the pundits and others: a small cabal of Democratic insiders have successfully disenfranchised millions of African-American voters (and other voters as well, of course).
I'm worried about this, and I suggest superdelegates take VERY seriously the candidate with the most popular voting delegates, whether this is Clinton or Obama. I know the rules are the rules and the rules are complicated, but rank-and-file party members and independents would like to believe that "one person, one vote" is a bedrock Democratic principle.
Thoughts? Am I swatting at windmills here?
|