Quote:
Originally Posted by Taliesin
I'm not sure that I understand you notahack. Your criticism is that because Obama asked his preacher to not get involved in politics, he is just another corrupt politician? How does that make sense? Have we become so accustomed to corruption in politics that we will jump on anything at all as "proof" of such?
|
You know something, you are probably right and doesn't that stink? if the above didn't ring with truth how in the heck could HillBilly still be in the race???? (sorry Clinton supporters)
Anyway, to the point about Obs. Yep, if he wasn't playing the tired old politics game then he could care less if Wright wanted to go and rant and rave. We've watched Obs become handled and polished right before our eyes and in essence, despite what he says about "change", he is one of them.
If "change" ultimately means just getting somebody that we all can look back and say "who the Hell is he" then yeh, Oprahma is your guy.
Me, I'd just like to see someone who would just get the damn house and senate out of constant gridlock and to actually earn their pay and represent the constituents. With a record of voting with his party 97% of the time, that is one problem I want to see changed and Obs isn't the guy for that.