Quote:
Originally Posted by smallpox
Most of the 21 demands weren't up held due to Yuan Shikai's insistence on ignoring certain clauses -- plus they not at all prove that China was a colony in 1915. Signing a treaty to open borders is a far cry to call a country a colony
Because they traded with foreign powers and received aid, they were a colony? That doesn't make any sense. I suggest picking up an encyclopedia and revising what a colony is, you really need it if you want to even begin to sound serious. The CCP received lots of aid from Lenin's International and other types of aid from the USSR until the Sino-Russian split in the 1960's. Does that make the CCP a Russian imperialist endeavor, or is the CCP along with the ROC and Northern warlords considered Chinese in every sense of the national myth? But of course that would prove you wrong, and shatter your false sense of authority you think you have over me (the only thing one can do when desperate to counter good arguments), and you'll defy many more definitions before we get to the bottom of this (the end will just be you ignoring my posts out of sheer discontent with you inabilities to form a serious argument in response to mine). I know the drill..
|
man do you really understand the word "semi colony" means? who ever stated China was a colony? me? no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smallpox
Because all attempts to halt the genocide in Sudan are vetoed against by China, because all economic sanctions to deprive the Sudanese government of funds to sponsor the Jinjewee militia has been opposed by China. Because China keeps investing and that gives the Sudanese government funds to airstrike Darfurian villages, because this isn't just Sudan, this is spreading into Chad and becoming a regional conflict. Who vetoed against sending an actual outfit of peacekeepers that could do a far more effective job than the African Union? China! All of this could have been stopped long ago without the CCP. Oh, but who gives a shit that over half a million people died due to violence and many more millions died of starvation or are about to and the countless of women raped, of torture scandals; but sovereignty is the only thing you care about.....even when the sovereign state has failed so obviously and so miserably.
|
so what? i know the terrible things out there but you can not expect a government sacrifices the economic development by stopping importing oil while 23 million people in this country consume less than 0.70 dollar per day. btw, where the sovereign state failes?
Quote:
Originally Posted by smallpox
What logic? I say the ROC and northern warlords were Chinese and that someone justifies China to sponsor the Sudanese government? Philosophy, ever heard of it? I suggest you read up on it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smallpox
WHAT FALLACY?.....why am I even trying to reason with you? I'll just stick to what I said above:
It's like you don't even know what a fallacy is.
|
what was i trying to justify anything? no. i was just telling you that theres someting wrong with your logic of proving China was a state with complete sovereignty just by that fact that those warlords were Chinese.