View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 07:07 PM
Wheeldog's Avatar
Wheeldog Wheeldog is offline
Baron
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,010
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzTeK View Post
The net energy gain of Ethanol from corn is essentially negative, and yet huge sums have been invested. Sure, the government subsidies have helped, but that's not going to change just because we turn to another fuel source. We need an alternative for oil that is economically, environmentally and ethically sound, and if the free market is not capable of making the switch on its own I don't see why the government shouldn't give it a little tap if it makes sense. Corn from ethanol however does not, unfortunately, so every cent the government invests here is in essence money thrown out of the window.
We are in agreement when it comes to corn ethanol. It is a looser insofar as a replacement for oil. Not only is it energy intensive to produce and contributes to high food prices, but it also is less efficient and more damaging than gasoline when burned in car engines.
Reply With Quote