Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChina!
vice versa means i think youve been committing fallacies too. plus, if you think your "unchalleged", you dont need to say that, you just keep up your nice facts giving work.
|
What fallacies have I committed? Viceversa isn't a call on fallacy. I have to say unchallenged because once you guys start your rampage of ignorance, there's no stopping it. I say something, it is ignored and then you bring it up as if I have never responded to it. Why wouldn't I bring it up?
Quote:
|
Japan's Twenty-One Demands in 1915: "The Chinese Government engage not to cede or lease to any other Power any harbour or bay on or any island along the coast of China." Not to mention the nominally fair, but actually unfair Sino-American Treaty of Friendship,Commerce and Navigation in 1946. This is enough to prove China then was far from decolonized. Semi-colonized, a very precise word.
|
Most of the 21 demands weren't up held due to Yuan Shikai's insistence on ignoring certain clauses -- plus they not at all prove that China was a colony in 1915. Signing a treaty to open borders is a far cry to call a country a colony.
Quote:
|
one word for this sentense: brazen. oh dont worry kid this is not an attack at your person, just this sentense, hehe. every warlord then was supported n sponsored by a foreign power.
|
Because they traded with foreign powers and received aid, they were a colony? That doesn't make any sense. I suggest picking up an encyclopedia and revising what a colony is, you really need it if you want to even begin to sound serious. The CCP received lots of aid from Lenin's International and other types of aid from the USSR until the Sino-Russian split in the 1960's. Does that make the CCP a Russian imperialist endeavor, or is the CCP along with the ROC and Northern warlords considered Chinese in every sense of the national myth? But of course that would prove you wrong, and shatter your false sense of authority you think you have over me (the only thing one can do when desperate to counter good arguments), and you'll defy many more definitions before we get to the bottom of this (the end will just be you ignoring my posts out of sheer discontent with you inabilities to form a serious argument in response to mine). I know the drill.
Quote:
|
according to your logic, then why the hell your bashing China for supporting Sudanese government? those are just Sudanese, and nobody else fighting with each other!
|
Because all attempts to halt the genocide in Sudan are vetoed against by China, because all economic sanctions to deprive the Sudanese government of funds to sponsor the Jinjewee militia has been opposed by China. Because China keeps investing and that gives the Sudanese government funds to airstrike Darfurian villages, because this isn't just Sudan, this is spreading into Chad and becoming a regional conflict. Who vetoed against sending an actual outfit of peacekeepers that could do a far more effective job than the African Union? China! All of this could have been stopped long ago without the CCP. Oh, but who gives a shit that over half a million people died due to violence and many more millions died of starvation or are about to and the countless of women raped, of torture scandals; but sovereignty is the only thing you care about.....even when the sovereign state has failed so obviously and so miserably.
What logic? I say the ROC and northern warlords were Chinese and that someone justifies China to sponsor the Sudanese government? Philosophy, ever heard of it? I suggest you read up on it.
Quote:
|
a fallacy is what you just presented above.
|
WHAT FALLACY?.....why am I even trying to reason with you? I'll just stick to what I said above:
It's like you don't even know what a fallacy is.