Quote:
Originally Posted by smallpox
What do you mean vice-versa? It's not because you aren't convinced due to your blind patriotism that I'm committing any sort of fallacies. Plus, if you aren't convince, you don't need to say that, you could respond with actual arguments.
|
vice versa means i think youve been committing fallacies too. plus, if you think your "unchalleged", you dont need to say that, you just keep up your nice facts giving work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smallpox
Shandong does not encompass all of China. When Japan withdrew from Shandong, it wasn't like the whole of China had been free from imperialism.
Oh, and I forgot to include Taiwan, but seems like according to your definition of imperialism, Taiwan is still some sort of colony...
|
Japan's Twenty-One Demands in 1915: "The Chinese Government engage not to cede or lease to any other Power any harbour or bay on or any island along the coast of China." Not to mention the nominally fair, but actually unfair Sino-American Treaty of Friendship,Commerce and Navigation in 1946. This is enough to prove China then was far from decolonized. Semi-colonized, a very precise word.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smallpox
Fact of the matter, these warlords, and the ROC were seen as Chinese in every sense of the myth of the Chinese nationality even today..
|
one word for this sentense: brazen. oh dont worry kid this is not an attack at your person, just this sentense, hehe. every warlord then was supported n sponsored by a foreign power.
according to your logic, then why the hell your bashing China for supporting Sudanese government? those are just Sudanese, and nobody else fighting with each other!
Quote:
Originally Posted by smallpox
Vice versa what? Vice versa the Versailles Treaty pre-dates the Trueman Doctrine?
It's like you don't even know what a fallacy is.
|
a fallacy is what you just presented above.