View Single Post
Old 05-08-2008, 09:21 AM   #16 (permalink)
GlobalSmiles
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 495
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wheeldog View Post
A basic truth of energy is there is no free lunch. Switch grass is subject to the same economic basics as any other source of energy; return on investment. What is the net energy gain in converting switch grass or any other alternative into a usable fuel? Until the last several decades conventional oil wells often returned 100 barrels of oil for the equivalent of each barrel of oil invested to extract it and convert it into a usable product. Today it is closer to 10-to-1. Switch grass may be easy to grow, but it still requires an investment of energy and technology to harvest, store, transport, refine and distribute. In the end the net energy gain is very small. This means that companies are reluctant to invest a lot of money into a process that has margnal profit return. There is also the issue of volume. It would take an enormous amount of switch grass to make a significant dent in our total consumption of liquid fuels.

Making dents in fuel usage is all about demand, trust me the demand in the US for alternative fuels is high again.

"This means that switchgrass ethanol delivers 540 percent of the energy used to produce it, compared with just roughly 25 percent more energy returned by corn-based ethanol according to the most optimistic studies."

Grass Makes Better Ethanol than Corn Does: Scientific American

This time I think we have the negative impact thing worked out.
GlobalSmiles is offline   Reply With Quote