|
Difference Between Hillary Clinton and Ron Paul
I just wrote about how many in the Democratic Party want Hillary Clinton to step out of the race, because she's dividing the party, among other things. Yet, she is nearly neck-in-neck with her foe Barack Obama and I don't think she should step down just yet.
This is far different then Ron Paul, who hasn't come in a close second place. I've written that he should step down because he doesn't have the huge donations or support like the three major candidates.
What do you guys think, should Hillary step down and why?
And more importantly, what do you think the reasons are that Ron Paul isn't beating John McCain or at least close enough to tap him on the shoulder? And no wild, conspiracy theories.
I had a lot of Ron Paul supporters a few weeks back who wanted my head on a silver plate because I wrote the Texas congressman should step out of the race because he wasn't doing that well, among other things.
Don't get me wrong, I agree with many of the things that Ron Paul is saying, but he just doesn't have that backing like McCain has, which has pushed the Arizona senator within fingertip reach of his party's nomination.
Ron Paul is telling it like it is and with so much talk about civil liberties allegedly being taken away and raising taxes and out-of-control spending, you would think more people would be behind him enough that he would have won a good number of states. So why aren't the majority of Americans backing the Texas doctor?
|