|
No one, except your article says the CCP wants to do away with the Washington Consensus and replace it with an conveniently similar Beijing Consensus....
It is relevant for progress in the future, especially considering China is still 50 years behind the other world powers. Is there any reason why economic laws and theories would not apply in the future? You have anything empirically substantial behind that rather than mere moral opposition to what you consider different from the Chinese way (even though it is a social axiom).
I don't think the invention of the wheel was imported from China into Europe. Regardless, no one is denying Chinese influence. I don't see why a technology that travel through the normal process of culture exchange and trade mean anything anyways. What's being thankful to China?
|