Quote:
Originally Posted by BratWurst
Your whole rebuttal to my scenario is based around the assumption that "you won't work according to the basic scientific rules". And then you accuse me of "you have not conducted a scientific theory by looking at anecdotal stories". Who said anything about stories? I didn't say my scenario was based on stories, I said evidence! I didn't say I heard gossip and by that I formulated an opinion that I thought my wife was cheating on me. I said evidence! You're not even responding with what I said! That's not an argument to my scenario, that's making up your own scenario!
|
You talked about making a scientific theory. Studying a single person in order to develop a new scientific theory in the field of sociology is nearly for sure completely insufficient. I already mentioned that the extraction of facts has to do a lot with statistics and probability. Its getting a bit hard to do that with only one test person. Thats the sort of "study" edutainment shows on television like to make to come with some random conclusion which is totally fine, but it has nothing to do with science.
To do serious scientific work, you have to do double or triple blind field studies, no need to tell you that with just one test person that is impossible. In order to remain with a compact reply I dont go down further, but there are lots of other aspects and fundamental reasons why your attempt has little to do with scientific work and therefore hardly can lead to a sufficiently supported scientific theory.