Quote:
Originally Posted by BratWurst
The Galileo comment wasn't my argument, it was a muse. And all you have told me is that there is a "solid base of evidence" to point towards evolution. Which still supports my "hunch" notion. Evidence, with a lack of proof. That takes something we call "faith", to believe.
|
Science has nothing to do with faith. Religion does. Science is purely common sense. You see evidence after evidence brought up to support a theory, in this case the theory of evolution, and due to innumberable studies and whatnot you come to the conclusion that, eventhough it's never gonna be 100% certain, it's certain enough to lend it the credibility it deserves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BratWurst
The fact is, that I never brought up creationism at all, and we were already talking about evolution. So in your opinion I have already brought up a subject that "has a solid base of evidence". Now, lets get to the proof. So a lot of people believe it based on evidence..that's all you got? Where's my monkey men? Oh LUCY, that's right, your missing link...right?
|
You clearly disagree with the theory of evolution, and since this whole thread is about the theory of evolution and creationism, then the assumption that you are a proponent of creationism was only a logic conclusion.
The evidence lies not only in the studies of thousands of fossils but also DNA of present and past animals on this planet and more. I don't know what you want to tell me with Lucy and your monkey men. Monkeys alive nowadays evolved from animals from our past, just as humans evolved from animals of our past. You are looking at two different paths evolution has taken when comparing monkeys we see today with humans.