Pardon my "aaa" reply, it was a mistake caused by a long absence period.

Aztek:

The Galileo comment wasn't my argument, it was a muse. And all you have told me is that there is a "solid base of evidence" to point towards evolution. Which still supports my "hunch" notion. Evidence, with a lack of proof. That takes something we call "faith", to believe.

The fact is, that I never brought up creationism at all, and we were already talking about evolution. So in your opinion I have already brought up a subject that "has a solid base of evidence". Now, lets get to the proof. So a lot of people believe it based on evidence..that's all you got? Where's my monkey men? Oh LUCY, that's right, your missing link...right?

Izzibeth:

You're a little off track. I never said science and hunch together. I said evolution and hunch. Talk about jumping to conclusions.

What you need to understand is that I don't believe evolution is, or should be involved with, science. That's my personal belief, so when I say "evolution is a hunch", I am NOT saying that science as a whole is a hunch. That IS ridiculous. And it's not really an assumption that people with knowledge make. I don't think people who say "Creationism is a simple belief and has no evidence supporting it" mean "All of science is a belief and has no merit or value". You learned how to debate in elementary school also I see, so we should do well together!

Slardibartfis:

Look, posting long posts doesn't make you look smarter. Shorten it up a bit bud. I've got a shorter post and I'm responding to 3 people!

Your whole rebuttal to my scenario is based around the assumption that "you won't work according to the basic scientific rules". And then you accuse me of "you have not conducted a scientific theory by looking at anecdotal stories". Who said anything about stories? I didn't say my scenario was based on stories, I said evidence! I didn't say I heard gossip and by that I formulated an opinion that I thought my wife was cheating on me. I said evidence! You're not even responding with what I said! That's not an argument to my scenario, that's making up your own scenario!

That's just saying, "I wouldn't trust your scientific skills." I can sum up a like rebuttal by saying "I don't trust evolutionists scientific skills"

__________________
"Just 1 presidency Per Household PLZ!"

"Hold on ma'am, the abortion is almost complete. I just have to count and make sure I got all the finger's and toes out of there."

RAPE is not a good reason to MURDER an innocent being.