Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChina!
your justifying those violence?
|
How the hell did you arrive at this half ass conclusion? I call for an alternative to violence, to prevent violent, and now I somehow justify violence? Whose post were you reading?
Quote:
|
we will reform to a liberal society, but this does not mean Tibet can be seperated. do you know the Dalai Lama's Greater Tibet plan? that is way too ridiculous.
|
Do you know that the CCP has an enormous bias and that further proliferating its propaganda is ridiculous? There's no reason to say that the Dalai Lama would be the leader of Tibet and there's no reason to think that Tibet would separate completely if it were given what the people want -- liberalism.
Quote:
|
no offense but i think what Stephen Harper states is alot less influential than Hu Jin Tao. he is elected too, rite?
|
I don't think so, Canada is a member of the G8, has closer relations to most countries and has achieved more on the international scene than HuJingTao or its predecessor. On top of that, Stephen Harper has no real power, since Canada is one of em....."democracy". It's funny when we received the Dalai Lama in my university, China issued notice not to receive him, no one paid attention to it.
Quote:
|
and also, What Bush states is so influential that you joined in Iraq war too huh?
|
Because we were already committed to the most volatile region in Afghanistan (and still are). Plus the fact that the war in Iraq was so far fetched, and that Bush is such a bad leader and yet still got the support of some countries shows a lot. Plus there has been a lot more accepted policies from the Bush Administration than that war. That war is 1 event/8 years of presidency.