Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
Obviously, your "argument" is merely repeating "invalid"
|
And I could repeat it over and over again on each of your assertions and it would be accurate. Yours is an argument ad nauseum, and I'm not going to continue to read these dishonest skews and mischaracterizations.
The only people who have come into this thread and commented have not agreed with you.
Again:
The vast majority of Founding Fathers, and a majority of the most influential Founding Fathers, supported the militia as the primary means of national defense. This majority allowed for the creation of a standing army for emergency situations, but did not intend for it to replace the militia as the primary means of defense. They believed the United States should remain neutral in foreign wars and should use the militia and army for defensive purposes only. They would not support current U.S. foreign policy.