Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
I've already done it,
|
No, you haven't.
Quote:
|
That's the whole problem, you haven't shown any proof to justify your stance on the issue.
|
Yes, I have. It is you who have shown no proof to back up your allegations.
Quote:
|
I'm saying first and foremost that you've shown lots of nice quotes, the only problem with those quotes is that none of them backup your central premise: "America's Founders were opposed to intervention and pre-emptive wars. ".
|
Everything I've posted does indeed support that premise.
Quote:
|
Your statement of criticism of the wisdom of the founders is a clear contradiction to what you are saying is the infallible wisdom of the founders.
|
No, it isn't, because every human being suffers from an inability to see the future. However, a logical law is a logical law, and should not change. 2+2=4 should not change to 2+2=5 in 250 years just because the supreme court of 2258 A.D. thinks that 2+2=4 is not really the intended meaning by the mathematicians of that day.
Quote:
|
Well it's your problem if you can't see why that's insulting.Your comment was an implied insult and thus the warning will be maintained not retracted.
|
If I do have an alleged problem, then I want to understand it. Since you claim to understand it, please explain
precisely why that was an implied insult, because I did not intend it as an insult.