View Single Post
Old 04-05-2008, 06:02 AM   #298 (permalink)
Delta9
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 46
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke9-05 View Post
There is evidence that marijuana use causes psychosis, impaired cognitive abilities, hallucinations, and even schizophrenia-like symptoms, and new research is becoming conclusively more and more negative in that mental aspect of the drug. That information doesn't come from "Reefer Madness," there are many legitimate points of reference that I've used throughout this debate for those side-effects (and you know this as much as I do). Television doesn't cause anything like that. At best, there are some people who have theorized that violent television might have some effect on what you're suggesting. But the most that comes out of that are theories. No real evidence or conclusive details.

Medical diagnoses, stats, charts, etc. on the other hand show marijuana as capable of inducing severely unstable, unpredictable mental side-effects, and that's added to the fact that it's inherently unpleasant and unhealthy to the user and those around the user without the side effects anyway. It's a selfish worthless indulgence yet it also impedes upon the rights of nonusers. The indulgence itself is fine. But part two of that equation crosses the line. It's no different with the speeding example.

Speeding can be seen as a "victimless crime" by the same damn logic. Someone speeds in a car is anyone getting hurt when they're speeding? No, but what's happening at the same time? There's a major increase in stopping distance and the vehicle they're driving becomes much harder to control. Unnecessary risk and potential hazard to those around them because of a selfish idiotic thing they chose to do. Someone smokes pot, is anyone getting hurt? Maybe not at the moment, but what's happening? God only knows what's going on in their brains. We haven't even mapped the whole human brain yet, so there's an additional factor to consider. What we do know is that it induces unstable and unpredictable side-effects such as psychosis, hallucinations, paranoia, impaired cognitive abilities, and even schizophrenia-like symptoms. Unnecessary risk and potential hazard to those around the user because of a selfish idiotic thing the user chose to do.

So in those cases is society going to wait for there to be a victim? No. Why not? Because that's ridiculous. Both scenarios are initiated by selfish, foolish actions--by people who don't seem to care about the consequences.
There is evidence that marijuana can induce psychosis and other mental problems, that is true. Though it is only for those with a genetic predisposition, this does represent a threat to society and members of it in many ways.

But this is true of any drug. Caffeine can induce psychosis in the exact same way. Same as alcohol, or even anti-depressants. Many forms of legal behavior do as well, those who are genetically predisposed are at risk of psychosis from violent imagery as well as addictive behaviors such as gambling.

You cannot attempt to protect the minds of free citizens, at least not without revoking their constitutionally held freedoms through due process.

Is schizophrenia illegal? No, we admit that we do not know what is the best for a persons psyche, so we allow those who wish to indulge in insanity to go unmedicated despite the inherit risk involved.

If we did not we would be wrong, we would be forcing addictive drugs into people system for no other reason than because it pacifies them, making them less of a risk to others. We have the freedom to be mentally unstable if we chose, because if we didn't all it would take to control someone is to declare them mentally unstable.
Delta9 is offline   Reply With Quote