View Single Post
Old 04-04-2008, 11:05 AM   #295 (permalink)
Locke9-05
SPAM Canner Mod
 
Locke9-05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,444
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by politicaldisgust View Post
that can be said about A LOT of thing, like nicer clothing, expensive sneakers, lobster, most of television, etc etc etc - but we will do want them and have an option to consume them, purchase them, and do what we want with them. you could argue that watching to much TV is worse then pot. It is bad for your eyes, your back, your weight, your fitness levels, your heart due to inactivity and on and on and one. Add it all up and you have way more negative damage to society then pot, but we still sell TV's, pay taxes on them etc etc.
Television isn't directly harmful or even potentially hazardous to anyone but those who choose to watch it. That's the idea here. People should be able to make their own decisions and do what they want as long as their choices and actions are not harmful or risky to those around them. Television is certainly not harmful or risky to those around the individuals choosing to watch it, and there's no evidence that indicates otherwise. It's an absurd theory. Marijuana is a completely different story--inducing side-effects that are potentially hazardous and risky, side effects that are outwardly unhealthy and unpleasant, etc.
__________________
"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country."
-John F. Kennedy

"Education begins the gentleman, but reading, good company and reflection must finish him."
-John Locke

"What worries you, masters you."
-John Locke
___________________

Locke9-05 is offline   Reply With Quote