Quote:
Originally Posted by Caltex
It is an assumption. As the only thing I know of that can produce such a post would be another human being. All evidence collected shows that humans can produce posts, and there has yet to be evidence reveal itself that non humans make internet posts. This is not at all similar to the assumption that there is a god, because you believe, based on no factual evidence that only a god could create the universe.
|
\
your last statment i cant agree with. If you cant even see me but yet you use your intelligence to deduce that another human is typing these posts by studing the signs.. what signs?? these abcdef.... you see these letters put in an order following a law you look at how the letters as signs and you deduce automaticly that hey this is a human being without even seeing me, by looking at the order of letters you have strong faith that im a human being. Well buddy, if you look at the earth the same way how it is put together and how it follows a law it shows structure and intelligence but wait you cannot see the designer. But your own intelligence should right away point to an intelligent designer for like the letters the earth and universe is in order and follows laws and without even seeing God i have strong faith that their is one and it would be better for your intellect to see this as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD
The proponents of religion always fail to recognize that there were political reasons for the invention of god. What is the saying?
If there was no god, man would invent god.
The invention of god served the purposes of a few elite men that wanted power. It continues that way today.
|
No invention of God, this come from deep studing of the earth that you arrive at the conclusion that their is a God, now if you use that to gain world power then sooner or later you will fall. Constintene took christianity for the reason of having more power and look at what happened in the end Rome fell..much later on.