Quote:
Originally Posted by Troianii
OK. When someone breaks the law and the receive the appropriated punishment, it is unjust?  It must be another one of those new European ideas that throws me for a loop.
You're misunderstanding my question, but regardless the original point stands: evolution requires assumptions. You've contended that we'll prove evolution with the new groupings - but we haven't, and you're making a second assumption in order to jump over the first. It's not all too convincing. |
Far greater assumptions are required to theorize that evolution does not occur than to theorize that evolution does occur. There was a lot of evidence before we could do DNA analysis, and it was confirmed and radically increased by DNA analysis. Anyone who isn't interested enough or technologically schooled enough (most of us) can theorize to THEMSELVES that evolution just ain't so, no matter if proof is found, or has already been found, or not.
Nevertheless, as long as this planet remains habitable at least for microorganisms, evolution will roll on long after we and all our assumptions are dead.