View Single Post
  #133 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 09:40 PM
TeaSea's Avatar
TeaSea TeaSea is offline
Knight
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 410
Location: Portland, Oregon
Country:
[quote=Troianii;156909]Alright, it could, but at this point it still requires assumptions.


[quote=Demarcoa;155270]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troianii View Post
Evolution requires assumptions, just as creationism does. The idea of evolution is that we've found fossils of entirely different species that look alike and change in some order, so we assume that the earlier species became the latter. In Creationism (or ID) we find that all around us the world is telling us that it had been designed. Evolutionists such as Hawkins have recognized this, but have said that the earth is trying to fool us.

I never said that evolution is all that simple, I said that (at this point) it requires certain assumptions, and at the present state that is the case.

And there's no need to jump the gun and attempt to refute point I didn't make (but you assumed I had).




Assumptions are made by human beings, the theory of evolution is made by a human being... BINGO!

And please, don't tell me that you haven't heard of Stephen Hawking?
Stephen Hawking is a theoretical physicist, not an evolutionary biologist. How did he get into this thread?
Reply With Quote