Quote:
Originally Posted by Twilightsfire
To repeat:
Sure it works. (Despite your fallacial assertion)
Again, if you cannot reveal any method of forcing a woman (or the gods forbid a teenager) to have a baby against her will then you will never make abortion go away.
Making the claim that the argument doesn't work is just that, a claim. And an invalid one.
Can you or anyone else provide such a method? (Heh...Don't even try. Your arguments so far haven't been well made)
No one will ever provide a Constitutional method that compels a woman to have a child against her will.
You can count on stories like this to be more commonplace if abortion were ever made illegal.
Not to mention the rise in single mothers. And how do you imagine they might support a child they can't afford to have? The runaway father? The government? |
There's no need to repeat. Blatant almost word-for-word repetition is pointless and ignorant in a debate such as this.
As for your "rebuttal," if you're going to be attempting to make subjective and pointed strikes at the nature of my arguments themselves without actual backing, I'd suggest you do it correctly--so as not to leave yourself open for swift counterattack. There is no such thing as a "fallacial" assertion, there is however, such thing as a "fallacious" assertion. Spell-check would come in handy for a moment such as that, as would familiarizing onesself with such terms before impulsively spouting them off in the first place.
Sex is for reproduction. Reproduction is the process by which human beings are created so they can grow and develop--not created so they can be killed. If a woman has sex (which is for reproduction), she is choosing to do something that in all probability will result in pregnancy. If and when that happens, there is another human being involved and it is not up to her to play God over that innocent life by snuffing it out--merely because she doesn't want it (even though she created it).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twilightsfire
Heh...Don't even try. Your arguments so far haven't been well made
|
A word to the wise, telling another debater your uninformed opinion--that their arguments "haven't been well made"--as if it's fact is not only pointless, it's also stupid, condescending, and arrogant. What's worse is when it comes back to haunt you after you've failed to make your attack "arguments" properly. If you continue to make such impulsive anti-civil and arrogant statements based on your opinion toward other members as if they're facts, you won't last long here.
Society can't physically force anyone to do anything. Society can't physically force drug dealers to stop dealing cocaine, society can't physically stop people from speeding in motor vehicles, society can't physically stop vandals from vandalizing others' property. So what does that mean? All those things will always be a problem. So apparently, it would seem you think that because there's no way to force people to stop doing cruel, immoral, irresponsible, and stupid things, that society should just roll over and let these things happen. What a "fallacial"
argument. Society doesn't let criminals commit crimes
without consequences and society shouldn't just let women murder the human beings they chose to create
without consequences There's no way to
force them to stop... Really?! Huh... Just like there's no way to physically prevent
any crime or immoral action, you mean?
The only way society acts is to implement
consequences for those actions. Do you understand that now? Is that clear now?