Thread: Tax the media
View Single Post
Old 01-30-2008, 11:22 AM   #14 (permalink)
KRiSWiN
Conscript
 
KRiSWiN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caltex View Post
What are you advocating protecting people from? TV has less sex and nudity than most peoples real lives. Most people have a few drinks on the weekends, so that is also a strange point. The only point where television really deviates from normal human activity is in violence.

If you do not want to even encounter sex on TV and have to change the channel, get a cable box and have it automatically block any program with a rating above which you wish to watch, and block channels notorious for lots of sex like MTV, Cinemax, FX, etc. Do the same if you have children you don't want exposed and have a password to unlock the content.

It's really not hard. People need to take some personal responsibility.
I don't disagree. Like I said, both sides make a good point. But I'll be watching a show on Nickelodeon or something, and the things they say sometimes are innuendoes or they are hinting toward something. It shocks me. It's Nickelodeon. And with the language thing, they bleep out the word "hole" but not the word "ass". It makes no sense to me. But I rarely watch T.V. anyway. I'm just saying what I've seen from the times I actually HAVE watch T.V. Again, I'm not saying your wrong. But If the government REALLY want's to push non violence, no teen/underage drinking, smoking, abstinence, etc...maybe they should make the F.C.C. do a little more.
__________________
KRiSWiN
KRiSWiN is offline   Reply With Quote