|
I read quite some editorials on that now. Most focus their criticism on the pope himself, calling the affair a "minor fauxpas" after his Regensburg speech about Mohammed, and claim that the almost fundamentalist and at least very conservative positions of bishop Wielgus were more important to pope Benedict than his past. Some also claim that the old pope John Paul II who was an outspoken enemy of the communist regime and made among the most important contributions to bring it down would never have tolareted a guy like this bishop in such a position.
|